<< Page 2 of 1 >>
10kb generated in CPU 0.0527, elapsed 0.0924 seconds.
84 queries taking 0.0792 seconds, 161 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy



Recent Comments

  • _Jon You don't have to be purty - you just have to have *some* attribute that a psycho finds irrisistable... entry
  • Contagion I'm not too worried about stalkers... I'm not pretty enough for a stalker. entry
  • Peter I am glad that some half of my posts are about shootin'. It seems to minimise the stalker types. Wel... entry
  • oddybobo Great post! entry
  • _Jon I'm sorry I got you involved in this M. I really am. Inter-blog fighting like this really takes aw... entry
  • michele kerfuffle n : a disorderly outburst or tumult; "they were amazed by the furious disturbance they ... entry
  • Smoke Eater Not to make light of the situation, but would you mind defining "kerfuffle"? I'm not familiar with ... entry
  • Ogre It also has "intent to harass" in there. So yes, by definition of the law, if you feel you are harr... entry
  • vw bug Thanks for the links to the law. Not one that reads them that often. But now I don't have to go to... entry
  • Ann Bartow Because Section 113 is aimed at preventing cybestalking via VOIP, to me that is the simple part, and... entry

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Sample link

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 50682
  • Files: 403
  • Bytes: 198.0M
  • CPU Time: 52:08
  • Queries: 2963826

Content

  • Posts: 843
  • Comments: 2606

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0