February 12, 2005
MY Central Park and The Gates of Hell
Central Park is a little slice of heaven in NYC for the 8 million people that live here. Over 15O years ago, the NYC legislature designated the 24 miles of farm and dairy land, as public space. In so doing, they assured that New Yorkers would have a refuge and comfort in natural wonder of nature.
As I approached Central Park Sunday, I thought about how my own personal history and development is so intertwined with this incredibly luscious green space in the summer, and how it has become for me this winter a quiet meditative grey space to help in my healing process from this damned carpel tunnel and tendonitis.
Last week, as I began to walk around in the park, after one of my physical therapy appointments, I began to see crews of men placing these dark pedestals on either side of the footpaths throughout the park. It was annoying because the walking paths are not very wide to begin with, and now these pedestals were further limiting the footpath space by over a foot in width by 3 feet in length on either side.
On Sunday when my son and I walked around we had to get out of the park because essentially there was not enough foot space for 4 people to walk side by side, so people were bumping into us constantly.
At first I was perplexed because these things were everywhere. It seemed like to massive a project for the Park Conservation Committee to undergo without letting NY residents know this would be happening. When I later heard about The Gates art project I was really annoyed. The total cost for the project: 23 Million dollars plus 3 Million for the 750 police officers to guard the exhibit every night for 16 nights.
At first I was just angry over the installation because the miles of non-biodegrable nylon tarp blocks everyone's view of nature in every direction. As you walk, all you can see is a sea of artificial flourescent/day glo orange fabric and steel. When I learned of the cost it pushed me over the edge. I love art, I even have 3 memberships to reflect my love, interest and support of art. To spend that much money on nylon, plastic and steel I feel is unconscionable!

Maybe if you saw the park from my point of view [in pictures], you might understand my love for this space, and my frustration with The Gates [of Hell], that are currently transforming my beloved park. Maybe then you'll understand why, even though I love art, I find this project to be an eyesore and a stressful nightmare.
more...
Posted by: Michele at
11:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1016 words, total size 7 kb.
1
I think I can understand exactly what you mean. To me, Cristo's 'art'--to be more exact, his promotion of it--has been more about getting his name in the paper than trying to make someone think. It has always seemed like he's trying to annoy as many people as he possibly can by calling it art.
Posted by: Victor at February 13, 2005 09:08 PM (etHvD)
2
I have very little love of abstract art, anyway - I prefer Romantic Realism - so I can definitely appreciate how eye-gougingly ugly these things are.
The fact that it's coming out of YOUR pocket is just an extra little kick in the shin.
Although, from a *purely* visual perspective, I could ALMOST think this would be ok if it were done in the fall, surrounded by fire-toned leaves.
Right now, it's just somewhere between gaudy & tacky.
Posted by: Harvey at February 15, 2005 01:39 PM (tJfh1)
3
This "eyesore" as you put it is only going to be around for 2 weeks...so I'm not sure all your ranting about a "stressful nightmare" and self-indulgent trip down memory lane serves much of a purpose either.
What DOES serve a purpose is the addition of the Gates project for these two weeks, in which time; many tourists will be visiting the city and spending money at restaurants, cafes and shops, not to mention your "beloved" art museums. Myself included.
Seems to me the city could use the sales tax revenue and the international coverage such a project brings about. They will also be signing books on two dates, which will also generate sales tax dollars.
My understanding is that the Christos pay for the entire project out of their own pocket (including materials, construction and disassembly. The flags are not being sold because they are going to be recycled.)
One should always do a little research before they post a public rant knocking someone else's work, creative or otherwise.
Signed,
Interested tourist from NJ
Posted by: Regina at February 15, 2005 02:43 PM (CgE5e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 05, 2005
9/11 Victims called Nazi's
I believe everyone has the right to speak their mind in a coherent and intelligent manner to prove their point. When you get to name calling, however, all bets are off. An insult like this can only be responded to with a swift kick to the "nads".
In his essay, Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens, CU professor Ward Churchill argues that:
• Victims of the Sept. 11th attacks were "technocrats of empire, ... little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers"
more...
Posted by: Michele at
09:10 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 477 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I'm with you Michele.
At least he's no longer chairman of the dept. and the Gov. of Col. is asking for his resignation - and it sounds like the fool (such a mile word) will lose his job.
Luckily they canx. the speech at Hamilton. It should have never been scheduled.
He's been harping about free speech. Well he's got it - it's just not free of consequence.
Posted by: Tammi at February 05, 2005 10:03 PM (HaRi0)
2
I'm thinking a good old fashioned tar & feathering is in order.
I'm a sucker for the classics.
Posted by: Harvey at February 07, 2005 11:42 AM (tJfh1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
19kb generated in CPU 0.011, elapsed 0.0413 seconds.
90 queries taking 0.035 seconds, 182 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.