July 20, 2005
In this case it was the City of New London Connecticut. What was going to be built on her property and that of her neighbors that required her eviction from her long time home? A nice big INDUSTRIAL park!
So, yes Virginia, they can take that away from you and the Supreme Court Justices said so. I wonder what they were smoking or what drugs they were on when they rendered THAT decision? Still don't care or don't think that Bush's nominee is at all important to you. Then go read Stephen Bainbridge's article at Tech Central Station on the significance of this vote and how the 5-4 vote played out. This article explains the situation quite well and succintly all in nice English and not legalese.
Essentially, the Majority of the Justices felt that "local officials know how to best help their own cities" Yes folk your elected politicians can vote today to have your home taken away and tomorrow, when they're out of office and work for the very developers, and live in the very development, over the land that was once your property. Don't think that can happen? That's exactly what did happen in Passaic New Jersey and the Supreme Court now says it's all perfectly legal!
Feel strongly about this, then go to Hold the Mayo and read the petition which Stephen Macklin and others have forged. It's now available for online signing and endorsement, through the link below. Update: the petition has been relocated to a new site. The link below will get you there.
Posted by: Michele at
12:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 347 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Contagion at July 20, 2005 09:48 AM (Q5WxB)
Posted by: vw bug at July 20, 2005 10:10 PM (i7MTM)
Posted by: Charles at July 20, 2005 10:11 PM (yte70)
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at July 22, 2005 06:53 PM (ics4u)
91 queries taking 0.0711 seconds, 207 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.